COPYRIGHT 1991

BOOK II

THE MANIFESTATION OF THE HOLY SPIRIT

ROMANS 8:26-29

"Likewise the Holy Spirit also helps our

infirmities: For we know not what we should pray

for as we ought: But the Holy Spirit Himself makes

intercession for us with groanings which cannot be

uttered. 27 And God that searches the hearts knows

what is the mind of the Holy Spirit, because the

Holy Spirit makes intercession for the saints

according to the will of God. 28 And we know that

all things work together for good to them that

love God, to them who are the called according to

His purpose. 29 For whom He did foreknow, He also

did predestinate to be conformed to the image of

His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many

brethren."

 

 

INTRODUCTION

The

nature and personality of the Holy Spirit is revealed in the

(fruit of the Spirit): "Love, joy, peace, longsuffering,

gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, and temperance" (Gal.

5:22-23). His power, on the other hand, is revealed in "word

of wisdom, word of knowledge, faith, gifts of healing,

working of miracles, prophecy, discerning of spirits, divers

kinds of tongues, and the interpretation of tongues" (I Cor.

12:8-10). The word "manifestation" used in I Corinthians

12:7: "But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every

man to prophet with all," is only used one other time in the

New Testament. It means (exhibition) or quite literally to

(display publicly). It is interesting to note that His

character traits listed in Galatians 5:22-23 are called the

"fruit" of the Spirit; not the (fruits) - plural. This

indicates a unity of personality and thus completeness. We

would never think of extracting or eliminating any of the

aspects of the fruit of the Spirit; yet many Christians today

are sinuously eliminating a number of those things listed in

I Corinthians 12:8-12 when considering the power of the

Holy Spirit. Again we must note that His power is revealed

as a "manifestation" (I Cor. 12:7), and not (manifestations)

- plural. If it is proper to omit any of the nine aspects of

His power - manifestation - it should likewise be proper to

eliminate aspects of His personality - fruit.

Now that we have examined the ministry of the

Holy Spirit as one who takes up partnership with us as we

pray, we need to look at how He displays [manifests] Himself

in prayer. Since His ministry is largely one of (making

intercession), we need to become acquainted with His prayers

in our behalf. Our text under study reveals the nature of

intercession and such knowledge should change the way we

pray.

 

 

 

CHAPTER 3

POWER PRAYERS

 

Although the Holy Spirit is often considered to be

passive in nature; quietly working behind the scenes,

Scripture reveals something far different. His power was at

work, for example, in creation as he hovered over the waters

(Gen. 1:2). Mary was informed by an angelic messenger that

as a virgin she would conceive and give birth to the Son of

God. When she questioned how this could be, she was told it

would be by the power of the Holy Ghost (Luke 1:34-35).

Jesus told His disciples that the Gospel itself would be

propagated by the power of the Holy Spirit (Acts 1:8). The

entire book of Acts, for that matter, demonstrates the force

of the New Testament church is totally dependant upon the

power of the Holy Spirit. Furthermore, the miracle of

regeneration occurs when we are sealed by the power of the

Holy Spirit (Eph. 1:13). The Holy Spirit is also credited

with the inspiration of Holy Scripture (II Peter 1:21 &

II Tim. 3:16). It is even the Holy Spirit who was

responsible for the bodily resurrection of Christ, and the

subsequent resurrection of saints at the end of this age

(Rom. 8:11).

From this Scriptural evidence, there can be no doubt

that the miracle working power of God is made available

through the manifestation of the Holy Spirit. It should be

no less surprising, therefore, that the text under study,

Romans 8:26-29, also reveals this same manifested power is

demonstrated in the intercessory prayers of the Holy Spirit.

AUTHORED PRAYERS

The Apostle Paul introduces the subject of (praying in the

Spirit) by saying: "Likewise the Holy Spirit also..." The

two words "likewise" and "also" means (in like manner) and

(additionally). Thus Paul is comparing the prayers of the

Holy Spirit to something he has already stated within

context. To what was he referring? If Romans 8 is read

carefully, it can be clearly seen that Paul was referring to

what he had said in Romans 8:16: "The Holy Spirit bears

witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God."

The One who bears witness with our spirit, or

(holds forth the truth), does so with power and authority.

Paul ties this character trait of the Holy Spirit's, power

and authority as the truth bearer, to the One who also "Makes

intercession for us."

As I stated in Chapter 2, the Greek interpretation of

this first mentioning of (makes intercession) in Romans 8:26

means simply that prayers are made [created] for us by the

Holy Spirit. Thus, the Holy Spirit intercedes for us by

making, creating, or originating prayers. In a very real

sense the Holy Spirit, as the One who bears witness with our

spirit, authors prayers for us and He does so with all the

power and authority in character with His nature as the

Truth Bearer identified in Romans 8:16. The question is, how

does He do this.

ARTICULATED PRAYERS

Lawyers serve as intercessors - skillful articulators of

the lawful language of the court - which provides suitable

representation for laymen unfamiliar with court procedure and

language. In a similar way we have spiritual representation

in the supernatural realm. The Holy Spirit, as our

intercessor, skillfully articulates our prayers before the

Father with "groanings which cannot be uttered." These

spiritually articulated prayers secure every word as we pray

in the Spirit; transcending all human comprehension and

knowledge.

The dictionary defines articulation as "To express or

formulate clearly and logically - distinctly uttered." Most

fail to spend much time in prayer because we have so often

experienced the inability to express the true nature of our

petitions in human terms. Some how the human language just

seems to fall short of what we really mean and feel. The

results of repetitive petitionings and decorous prayers

is spiritual emptiness and frustration as well as neglect.

Add to this the effect of demonic forces which war against us

as we pray; attempting to frustrate the forth coming answer,

and it is understandable why we spend so little time with our

Lord. It is comforting, therefore, to know that we have one

who is able to spiritually articulate our prayers with

preciosity in terms fully understood by our Heavenly Father.

These supernatural prayers of the Holy Spirit ar distinct

utterances in the spiritual realm and thus are beyond the

nature of human speech. When we pray, therefore, we need

only rest in our partnership with the Holy Spirit who will

manifest Himself as an intercessor with prayers too deep for

words.

 

 

GROANINGS WHICH CANNOT BE UTTERED

From our text, we learn that the nature of the

Holy Spirit's intercessory prayers are "groanings which

cannot be uttered." This old English form of speech looses

nearly all of its true meaning in modern vernacular. To us,

"groanings" would probably mean something like (moanings);

"uttered" would have little, if any, real meaning at all.

Without examining the Greek therefore, we might conclude that

the prayers of the Holy Spirit are wordless mumblings. Such

communications would be purposeless; but from the very

reading of the text itself, we must recognize that these are

intercessory prayers which are clearly understood by our

Heavenly Father.

The Greek rendering of this phrase, "groanings which

cannot be uttered," is (sighs which are unspeakable). This

is a statement of nature not content. As one who has lived

their entire life in the midwest, I would probably refer to

someone from the state of Alabama, for example, as having a

southern accent. This has nothing to do with the content of

what one has spoken; it merely is in reference to their

nature of speech. Paul is likewise referring to the nature

of the Holy Spirit's prayers. They are prayers offered with

such spiritual depth and earnestness that they are beyond

human words of description.

Consider describing in detail the beauty of a rainbow to

someone born blind. There are simply no human words of

description which would bring comprehension to the mind of

one who has never seen. From one's tone of voice, however,

and expression of awe, a blind person would certainly gain

intellectual insight to the beauty of the rainbow, even if

they had no comprehension of color. We can conclude the

same, therefore, from Paul's description of prayers which the

Holy Spirit offers in our behalf. They are prayers too deep

for words.

UNSPEAKABLE

As already stated, a simple reading of our text would

perhaps leave one to conclude that the prayers of the

Holy Spirit are wordless mumblings without form or

substance. This is certainly not true since our

Heavenly Father understands them perfectly. The phrase,

"which cannot be uttered," simply means unspeakable. The

Apostle Paul made use of this word in his experience of being

caught up into the third heaven which he described in

II Corinthians 12. In verse 4 of that chapter he said that

in Paradise he heard unspeakable words, "which is not lawful

for man to utter." He heard them but what he heard was not

describable in human terms. So it is with the prayers of the

Holy Spirit. His prayers are beyond man's natural ability to

speak. Thus they are unutterable to him.

 

 

 

 

ILLUSTRATION

The ocean dolphin is a good example of the true meaning

of "groanings which cannot be uttered." They communicate

between themselves by using high frequency chirps, squeaks,

and whistles under water. Man is unable to hear these

sounds without special underwater equipment. Even with such

equipment; we are still unable to interpret their language.

To say that the dolphin makes unutterable sounds in today's

manner of speaking would be incorrect. Not, however, in the

day of the King James translators. They used this form of

translation to indicate the words which are used by the

Holy Spirit in prayer were supernatural and beyond man's

ability to interpret. In man's element the prayers of the

Holy Spirit are indescribable or unspeakable. Similarly, the

dolphin's sounds are uttered in a realm unnatural to that of

man and thus we do not hear them. They are not unutterable,

therefore, simply unnatural to man. Such are the prayers of

the Holy Spirit.

SPIRITUAL ARTICULATION

No where in Scripture is it recorded that the

Holy Spirit spoke audibly. God the Father spoke audibly on

several occasions to men on earth and of course Jesus did

also during His earthly ministry. The Holy Spirit on the

other hand has only done so when speaking through others.

Such is the case in Acts 2:4: "And they were all filled with

the Holy Spirit, and began to speak with other tongues,

[languages,] as the Holy Spirit gave them utterance." The

verse proceeding this statement in Acts 2:3 describes this

occurrence: "And there appeared unto them cloven tongues

like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them." The word

"cloven" means (split) or (divided). The purpose of this

supernatural appearance of split, or divided, tongues of fire

was symbolic. The one hundred twenty that had been in the

upper room praying were awaiting the promised manifestation

of the Holy Spirit (Acts 1:4-8). As they did so, the house

suddenly filled with a mighty rushing sound of wind from

Heaven, and the supernatural phenomenon of fire that

appeared as tongue-like manifestations sat over each one; the

result was the speaking of languages unknown, unfamiliar, to

them personally (Acts 2:3). We know they were languages

because at least seventeen known languages were identified

by the onlookers (Acts 2:9-12). It should be obvious from

the context, however, that there were many more languages

than just the seventeen (Acts 2:5). It is very likely, in my

opinion, that each of the one hundred twenty spoke a

different language as they were all individually filled with

the Holy Spirit. What was the purpose of this supernatural

manifestation of the Holy Spirit?

 

I believe there are at least four reasons for the

manifestation of the Holy Spirit as recorded in Acts 2:4.

First, it confirmed the words of Jesus in John 14 and 16 as

well as Acts 1. The disciples were promised that the

Comforter would come and come He did in Acts 2:4. He did so

with such manifested power there could be no denial.

Secondly, Acts 2:4 signaled the church age and the power

of God was made available to the church through the direct

ministry of the Holy Spirit.

Thirdly, Acts 2:4 was a supernatural demonstration of

God's power to the lost and helped to spread the Gospel

rapidly throughout the known world by those who witnessed the

event. One must note, however, that the manifestation of

tongues was not itself used to spread the Gospel to the known

world.

Finally, Acts 2:4, as well as subsequent passages in the

book of Acts, confirmed the difference between Ephesians 1:13

- being sealed by the Holy Spirit at the moment of salvation

- and Acts 2:4 - being filled with the Holy Spirit for power.

Shortly before our Lord's return to Heaven, He appeared

to His disciples and breathed on them and said, "Receive ye

the Holy Ghost" (John 20:22). Ephesians 1:13 confirms we

are sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise when confession is

made that Jesus is Lord. Acts 2:4, on the other hand,

confirms the witnessing power of the Holy Spirit when one is

filled.

CLOVEN TONGUES OF FIRE

The question is often raised, "what were the cloven

tongues of fire?" These were supernatural manifestations of

fire which appeared as tongue-like figures and sat over each

of the one hundred twenty as they spoke new languages. These

luminous apparitions were tongue-like forms which appeared

over each; demonstrating the presence of the Holy Spirit as

they spoke new languages unfamiliar to them personally. The

onlookers confessed exactly that:

"Now when this was noised abroad, the multitude

came together, and were confounded, because that

every man heard them speak in his own language.

And they were all amazed and marveled, saying, one

to another, Behold, are not these which speak

Galileans? And how hear we every man in our own

tongue, wherein we were born" (Acts 2:6-8).

 

 

The appearance of the tongue-like flames of fire were simply

to demonstrate the presence of the Holy Spirit as He

manifested Himself in supernatural speech.

As is so often the case, the skeptical and unbelieving

try to explain the miraculous of God by human means. The

dubious in this crowd accused these Spirit filled Christians

of drunkenness; although it was only mid morning when they

made their charge. Upon hearing this, Peter switched,

apparently without difficulty, back to the common language of

the day; and explained to them what they were currently

witnessing. This also demonstrates that although they spoke

"as the Spirit gave them utterance," they were not

controlled.

As I mentioned earlier, the word "cloven" means (split)

or (divided). This aspect of the manifestation simply

demonstrated the disciples were speaking divided languages -

languages unknown to them personally. The on-lookers clearly

recognized this from the beginning according to the context.

Simply put, Acts 2:4 is a supernatural manifestation by the

Holy Spirit of spiritual articulation: "As the Holy Spirit

gave them utterance."

WHICH CANNOT BE UTTERED

Paul informed us that the prayers of the Holy Spirit are

"groanings which cannot be uttered." If this King James

rendering is literal, it theologically conflicts with Acts

2:4 which confirms that the Holy Spirit's utterances are

audible: "And they all began to speak with other

tongues/languages, as the Spirit gave them utterance."

Presumably, when the Holy Spirit of God desires to do so, His

utterances can be verbalized by Spirit filled men.

Romans 8:26 does not say that the prayers of the Holy Spirit

are unutterable; but rather the Greek discloses that the

prayers are (unspeakable.) This must be interpreted to mean

humanly, that is, naturally, because we know the

Heavenly Father understands these prayers. According to Acts

2:4, if there are Spirit filled persons available, the

spiritual articulations of the Holy Spirit are utterable -

made audible - as He, the Holy Spirit; wills. Could Paul

perhaps be referring to something entirely different when he

spoke of the prayers of the Holy Spirit as "groanings which

cannot be uttered?" This would be a good time to make a

conscientious examination of the other Biblical references to

the tongues phenomenon to see if indeed Paul was referring to

something unique; thus in the process, perhaps we can gain

greater spiritual insight to "groanings which cannot be

uttered."

THE EARLY CHURCH

The book of Acts records three specific accounts of the

tongues phenomenon. Acts 2 details the day of Pentecost when

one hundred twenty disciples were all filled with the

Holy Spirit and began to speak divided languages. Acts 10

records Peter ministering to the house of Cornelius, a

gentile, and they, too, were filled with the Holy Spirit and

began to speak in tongues. The third account is found in

Acts 19. Paul is credited with ministering to the twelve men

at the church in Ephesus by the laying on of hands. They

likewise were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to

speak in tongues.

There are additionally three other possible references

in the book of Acts to the tongues experience. AFter Peter

and John preached in the synagogue in Acts 3, they were taken

by the leadership and threatened concerning the doctrines

they were teaching. These two men testified of these events

to the Jerusalem church in Acts 4 and upon the conclusion of

their witness, the church began to praise and worship God.

As they concluded their worship, a very similar experience

took place that parallels that of the Acts 2 record.

Although tongues is not mentioned in this occurrence, it

would be poor Biblical hermeneutics to dismiss the

comparison.

Philip the evangelist traveled to Samaria in Acts 8 and

preached the gospel. The Samaritans were converted and water

baptized (Acts 8:12). Peter and John, however, were

dispatched by the Jerusalem leadership to go to Samaria to

lay hands on these new Christians that they might receive the

"Holy Ghost" (Acts 8:14-17). Again we find no mention of

tongues, but it would be difficult to believe that Peter and

John expected something less, since they were specifically

sent to lay hands on the Samaritans to receive the

Holy Ghost.

Finally there is the account of Paul's own conversion in

Acts 9. Ananias, a disciple of the Lord in Damascus, was

told by the Lord in a vision to go and lay hands on Paul.

Ananius was commanded by the Lord Himself to do this for two

reasons: That Paul might receive his physical sight and that

he, Paul, might be filled with the Holy Ghost (Acts 9:17).

When the one hundred twenty were filled with the Holy Spirit

in Acts 2:4, they spoke with tongues/languages. We cannot

assume anything less for Paul since he confessed to the

Corinthians; "I thank my God, I speak with tongues more than

ye all" (I Cor. 14:18).

We find additional proof that the apostle Paul spoke

with tongues when he was filled with the Holy Spirit in Acts

19 as he later meets with the twelve men in the church of

Ephesus. They confessed, when interrogated by Paul, that

they had never even heard of the Holy Spirit (Acts 19:2).

Verse (6) says that Paul "Laid hands" on them and the

Holy Ghost came upon them and they spake with tongues. The

only laying on of hands with which Paul was familiar was that

of his own experience in Acts 9. There can be no doubt,

therefore, that Paul spoke with tongues when Ananius laid

hands on him in Damascus.

 

 

The book of Acts spans at least twenty years. The

practice of laying on of hands and the receiving of the

filling of the Spirit was common place in the early church.

Apostles were sent specifically to lay hands on new converts

that they might receive the Holy Spirit, Paul himself

experienced the same, and even Peter was sent by the Lord to

minister the same to gentiles. The early church recognized

the difference between being sealed by the Holy Spirit at the

moment of salvation and being filled with the Holy Spirit for

power. They also recognized that speaking in tongues - new

languages - was the evidence experienced by the one being

filled with the Spirit as well as the fulfillment of the

promise of Jesus: "And these signs shall follow them that

believe; in my name shall they cast out devils; they shall

speak with new tongues" (Mark 16:17).

THE EPISTLE TO THE EPHESIANS

Paul's letter to the church of Ephesus included a

reminder that they should continue in being filled with the

Holy Spirit (Eph. 5:18). The Greek, in this command to be

filled with the Spirit, is literally (be being filled) with

the Holy Spirit. Paul, by inspiration of the Holy Spirit, was

commanding the church at Ephesus to continue being filled

with the Holy Spirit. The only knowledge that they could

have had of being filled with the Holy Spirit was that which

had been ministered to them by Paul when he laid hands on

them in Acts 19. He encouraged them to continue in what they

had received and he offered them Scriptural help in

maintaining the Spirit filled life (Eph. 5:17-21).

THE EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS

By far the most controversial chapter in all of the

New Testament is I Corinthians 14. Many insist that Paul

wrote to the Corinthian church and condemned their usage of

tongues. Yet in the epistle he affirmed that what he was

teaching them on the subject of tongues were the "commands of

God" (I Cor. 14:38). He immediately followed this statement

of authority by commanding them not to forbid the speaking in

tongues in verse (39).

THE PURPOSE

Paul makes several sententious statements on the

subject of tongues in I Corinthians 14: One who speaks in

tongues does so "unto God;" [14:2]. Tongues is speaking in

the Spirit; "mysteries," (secrets) [14:2]. Tongues

"edifieth," or, (builds up), [14:4]. He even confesses his

desire is for "all to speak in tongues," [14:5].

furthermore, e states that the interpretation of tongues in

the church is for "edifying;" [14:5]. He also instructed

that when tongues are used by one in the church, he should

first pray that he, the one speaking in tongues, "may

interpret;" [14:13]. Praying in tongues is to do so with

one's human spirit; not the "mind/intellect;" [14:14]. Paul

also boldly confessed to both "praying" and "singing" in

tongues [14:15], and Apparently it is also possible to bless

someone in tongues with one's human spirit according to I

Corinthians 14:17-18. Paul even said he spoke in tongues

more than anyone in the Corinthian church [14:18]. He also

gave instructions that tongues were for a sign for

"unbelievers" [14:22], which was exactly what took place in

Acts 2:4. Beginning in I Corinthians 14:27 and continuing

through the balance of the chapter, Paul offers instructions

for usage of tongues in the local church. He concludes his

remarks on the subject in the final verse by saying; "Let all

things be done decently and in order." That is the purpose

of the church; that all things be done, and be done in order.

To conclude that this chapter is simply not applicable for

today's church would negate that "all things be done."

Paul not only encouraged the Corinthian Christian to

seek the spirituals (I Cor. 14:1). but recognized their zeal

for such (I Cor. 14:12). Their problem was thinking that

speaking in tongues demonstrated superior spirituality and

Paul rebuke them for their pride. He gave them instruction,

therefore, on how such zeal should be directed in a public

church service and that in such meetings they were to preach

in the known language of the day. Tongues were certainly

acceptable from two, or at the most three persons, [see

verses 27 and 28], during a church meeting; but there should

immediately follow an interpretation. If an interpretation

was given, then that interpretation was to be judged by the

spiritual leadership of the church for doctrinal soundness.

If there was no interpretation offered, the one speaking in

tongues was then to remain silent (I Cor. 14:28). In

contrast, the Corinthian Believer was instructed not to

remain silent if speaking to himself - implied privately -

for spiritual edification, and as he did so, he was speaking

to God (I Cor. 14:28).

THINGS TO CONSIDER

It is clear that the Holy Spirit began His ministry in

the church in Acts 2:4 and His manifestation of power

continued on throughout the early church. Being filled with

the Holy Spirit was associated with the laying on of hands,

in most cases, and the speaking of tongues. Paul instructed

the Ephesians in their letter to continue in what they had

received in Acts 19 by the laying on of hands. He likewise

instructed the Corinthians on the purpose of practicing

tongues both in public and in private. He, the Apostle Paul,

through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit even warned those

who might attempt to forbid the speaking of tongues after his

epistle had been read in their hearing. It is also often

argued that the tongues experience was limited to the three

occurrences recorded in the book of Acts; a more careful

examination of Scripture would prove it was the norm and not

the exception. It is even suggested that tongues disappeared

after the death of the last apostle, but no one is able to

determine when that may have been or how many there were.

The greatest supporting evidence that the sign of

tongues has ceased is usually taken from I Corinthians 13:8-

10:

Charity never faileth: But whether there be

prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be

tongues, they shall cease; wether there be

knowledge, it shall vanish away. For we know in

part, and we prophesy in part. But when that which

is perfect is come, then that which is in part

shall be done away.

The key issue in this text is the meaning of "When that

which is perfect is come." Some choose to interpret this to

mean the Scriptures. When the Scriptures, or the Bible

itself, was complete; tongues should have passed away. If

this is true, then we must also conclude that prophecies and

knowledge must likewise have passed away when the Bible was

finally canonized. In Chapter 14 of i Corinthians Paul

identifies prophesy as the preaching of God's Word for the

edification of the church. If tongues ceased upon the

completion of Scripture, then the preaching of the Word and

knowledge likewise must cease.

The Greek translation of the word "perfect" in

i Corinthians 13 is (perfection); not the word rhema or

logos; the Greek terms for The Word. This is substantiated by

Paul's further teaching in 1 Corinthians 13:12: "For now we

see through a glass, darkly, but then face to face: Now I

know in part, but then shall I know even as also I am known."

We must agree that we today also see through a glass

darkly. Know one can confess all Scripture as properly

interpreted today for there will always be a differing of

opinions in many minor areas of Bible thought. There is

coming a day, however, when we will see face-to-face and will

be known even as we ar known by God:

"Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth

not yet appear what we shall be: But we know that,

when He shall appear, we shall be like Him; for we

shall see Him as He is" (I John 3:2).

When this perfection takes place, all things which have gone

before will cease, including the preaching of God's Word,

knowledge, and tongues.

 

FAITH HOPE CHARITY

Upon concluding I Corinthians 13, it is suggested that

Paul confirmed the passing of the usage of tongues by today's

church because he said only three gifts remain:

"And now abideth faith, hope, and charity, these three;

but the greatest of these is charity" (I Cor. 3:13). If this

were true, that tongues passed away and there are only three

remaining spiritual gifts, we would also therefore have to

conclude that the five gifts of the church recorded in

Ephesians 4 - apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors and

teachers - were also eliminated and we would by necessity

have to eliminate Romans 12; the gifts of helps. We would

even be obligated to eliminate (knowledge) and (prophesy( -

preaching if such interpretation is to be followed to its

logical end. Paul's statement is simply one of fact. These

three are, or will always remain, even when we see our Lord

face-to-face with glorified bodies. We will live eternally

with Him and faith, hope, and love will continue since they

are eternal. I Corinthians 13:13 could be read in the

Corinthian's day and in our day and in every generation to

follow because it is eternal. Tongues, knowledge, miracles,

water baptism, resurrection, judgment, communion, all will

pass away when Jesus returns.

FINAL PROOF

There is one unbending Biblical reference which confirms

tongues is for today's church. Upon being accused of being

drunken at nine o'clock in the morning, Peter stood,

switching back into the common language of the day, and began

to explicate:

But Peter, standing up with the eleven, lifted up

his voice, and said unto them, "Ye men of judea,

and all ye that dwell at Jerusalem, be this known

unto you, and harken to my words: For these are

not drunken, as ye suppose, seeing it is but the

third hour of the day. But this is that which was

spoken by the prophet Joel; and it shall come to

pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out

of my Spirit upon all flesh; and your sons and your

daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall

see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams:

And on my servants and on my handmaidens I will

pour out in those days of my Spirit; and they shall

prophesy: And I will show wonders in heaven above,

and signs in the earth beneath; blood, and fire,

and vapor of smoke: The sun shall be turned into

darkness, and the moon into blood before that great

and notable day of the Lord come: And it shall

come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the

name of the Lord shall be saved (Acts 2:14-21).

Peter makes it as clear as anyone. He explained, what

was currently being witnessed by the crowd, was for "the last

days" (acts 2:17). He even attributed this statement to the

Lord; "saith God" (Acts 2:17). He parenthetically confirmed

this entire period of time in Acts 2:21 by saying these are

the days upon which men may call upon the Lord to be saved.

This period of time is made available until that "great and

notable day of the Lord" (Acts 2:21). The Apostle Peter, who

was filled with the Holy Spirit at the time, and thus

speaking with the authority of God, confirmed tongues as

evidence of the Holy Spirit's manifested power in the

New Testament church. We are living in "the last days;" that

period of time when men may call upon the name of the Lord to

be saved. Acts 2 ushers in the ministry of the Holy Spirit

in the age of the New Testament church and one way His power

is manifested is revealed in tongues, or, the ability to

spiritually articulate languages unknown by the speaker as

the Holy Spirit gives them utterance.

I think it also important to note that Peter did not

continue to speak in tongues as he preached this Gospel

message to the on-lookers but preached to them in the common

language of the day to explain what they were witnessing

(Acts 2:14). Some suggest the purpose of tongues was limited

to the early church simply to help the Gospel to be spread

worldwide rapidly. If this is true, it cannot be proven from

Acts 2 or any other New Testament text; nor is there ever any

Biblical instruction given by any of the inspired

New Testament writers in how such should be used to spread

the Gospel of our Lord. It is unquestionably God's will for

the known language of those hearing the Biblical message

preached to be the vehicle of transmission and not the

speaking of tongues. This is, in fact, why Paul was inspired

by the Holy Spirit to instruct the Corinthians in I

Corinthians 14 since they were using the gift of tongues

incorrectly.

CONCLUSION

If Paul wrote to us concerning the prayers of the

Holy Spirit in Romans 8:26, "groanings which cannot be

uttered," the only form of prayer, common to the Holy Spirit,

with which he would be familiar; would be that referred to as

(praying in the Spirit), or (praying in tongues). These are

prayers of power; too deep for human words. They are prayers

which the Holy Spirit creates perspicuously by His own

nature and authority as God. Paul was familiar with speaking

in tongues and even confirmed that he spoke in tongues more

than any one he personally knew (I Cor. 14:18). If, in

Romans 8:26, he is referring to something else, he never made

this clear in any of his other writings. He instructed the

Corinthians that praying in tongues was spiritually edifying

and when one did so, he was speaking secrets to God (I Cor.

14:2). I believe that the (groanings which cannot be

uttered) are a direct reference to the power prayers of the

Holy Spirit; evidenced by one praying in the Spirit -

(tongues). If one chooses to interpret this phrase

differently, the one thing we all would agree on without

question; is that the prayers of the Holy Spirit are prayers

of power and He offers these intercessory prayers of power

in our behalf according to the will of God.