Æ�Æ Do Mormons "Really" Believe in the Bible?

Isaiah 41:21 - Set Forth your case

I Peter 3:15 - Be prepared, always

The credibility of a religious claim rests upon its ability

to verify its terms. In the year of 1800, the French Institute in

Paris issued a list of 82 "errors' that it had found in the Bible

and felt would destroy Christianity in short order. In 1804, not

one of the alleged errors remained!

In the year 1901, the American Society of Archeology claimed

that the Biblical account of a peoples called the Hittites was

false. In 1933, archeologists found conclusive proof of the

existence of the Hittites and other peoples that the Bible had

claimed existed!

The primary question for this text is: "Why are we

discussing the matter of the Bible and its completeness? Doesn't

the Mormon church accept the Bible as the Word of God?" To

respond, let me quote from the sources of the Mormon church:

8th Article of Faith - "We believe the Bible to be the word

of God as far as it is translated correctly; we also believe the

Book of Mormon to be the Word of God."

Joseph Smith, in Teaching of the Prophet Joseph Smith, page

327, stated "Ignorant translators, careless transcribers, or

designing and corrupt priests committed many errors.' and the

mormon apostle Mark E. Peterson states in his book, As Translated

Correctly - page 4, "Many insertions were made, some of them

"slanted' for selfish purposes, while at times deliberate

falsifications and fabrications were perpetrated.'

Orson Pratt further made a comment in his book, Divine

Authenticity of the Book of Mormon - pages 45 & 47, thus: "If it

be admitted that the apostles and evangelists did write the books

of the New Testament, that does not prove of itself that they

were divinely inspired at the time they wrote ... Add all this

imperfection to the uncertainty of the translation, and who, IN

HIS RIGHT MIND could for one moment suppose the Bible in its

present form to be a perfect guide? Who knows that even one verse

of the Bible has escaped pollution, so as to convey the same Üf�Ü�sense now that it did in the original?"

The Book of Mormon, II Nephi 29:6 states "Thou fool, that

shall say a Bible, we have got a Bible and we need no more Bible.

Have ye obtained a Bible save it were by the Jews?" Can you note

the FOOLS are the only ones who trust in the Bible? Read verse

10. Here, the Book of Mormon declares the need for more

revelation and makes way for its own existence!

A point of interest - turn to I Nephi 13:26: "a great and

abominable church - has taken away from the gospel of the Lamb

many parts which are plain and precious; and also many covenants

of the Lord have they taken away." The Book of Mormon tells us

that this is 600 B.C.! Do you know what B.C. means - BEFORE

CHRIST! So we are told that the gospel of the Lamb has been

polluted six hundred years before the Lamb or His Gospel was

recorded in the New Testament and given at the Passover!


The Bible was composed over a period of 1,500 years by more

than 40 different authors from the full range of humanity: from

military generals (Joshua) to prime ministers (Daniel) to

cupbearers (Nehemiah) to fishermen (Peter) to tax collectors

(Matthew) to kings (David). The books were written in many

different places: the wilderness (Moses), prison (Paul), and

exile (John on the Island Patmos). On three different continents

(Africa, Asia and Europe) and in three different languages

(Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek).

The content, yet, remains constant in its unfolding of the

plan of salvation through Christ Jesus. The Old Testament reveals

itself to be the story of the preparation for the arrival of the

Messiah or Christ. The Gospels of the New Testament are the

manifestation of the Christ in the person of Jesus of Nazareth.

Acts is the propagation of the message. The Epistles give the

explanation and the Revelation of John provides the consummation

of the Kingdom of God in Christ Jesus or Lord! The entire Bible

is about Jesus (Luke 24:27 - 44 and John 5:39,46,47). I challenge

any Mormon to take any ten people, and you can even get them from

the same heritage - education - language and culture and ask them

separately to give you their opinion of the meaning of life - you

will get opinions of such variety, yet the Bible consists of over Üf�Ü

40 authors of more than one generation with very little

similarity and is in total unity! Complete harmony!

In discussion of the matter of infallibility of the Bible we

need, first to look at the process that we use to arrive at this


PREMISE # 1 - The Bible is basically a reliable and trustworthy


PREMISE # 2 - On the basis of this reliable document, we have

sufficient evidence to believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of


PREMISE # 3 - Jesus Christ, being the Son of God, is an

infallible authority. (Luke 24:27,44; John 5:39; Hebrews 10:7)

PREMISE # 4 - Jesus Christ teaches that the Bible is MORE than

generally trustworthy. He teaches that it is the very Word of


PREMISE # 5 - The WORD, in that it comes from God, is utterly

trustworthy because GOD is utterly trustworthy!

PREMISE # 6 - On the basis of the infallible authority of Jesus

Christ, the Bible is infallible.

II Timothy 2:13 declares that God "cannot deny Himself" and

Galatians 1:8,9 tells us that we should be wary of any teaching

of any other Gospel than that which Paul preached, which by the

declaration of Paul in Romans 15:19 states that "I have fully

preached the Gospel of Jesus Christ."

The Mormon church is unable to provide any proof that Paul

taught such doctrines as celestial marriage, no hell, wearing of

sacred underwear, or godhood to be obtained. It is proper to

state that if Paul never taught such doctrines, then Galatians

1:8-9 CONDEMNS them! The claim of the LDS that more scripture is

necessary is groundless.

In II Peter 1:3, we are told that "His divine power hath

given unto us ALL things that pertain to life and godliness."

Paul further explained in Colossians 2:10 that "Ye are COMPLETE

in Him." If just these two statements are true, what possible use

could additional scripture be? Granted that nowhere in the Bible

does it state that "This is the end of Scripture"; However, with Üf�Ü

the above statements, anything else could ONLY be redundant. It

is obvious from the text of the New Testament that the writers

were "eyewitnesses" of the ministry and presence of Jesus Christ.

(II Peter 1:15-18 and I John 1:1-5)

Acts 22:14-15 and I Corinthians 11:23 show that the Apostle

Paul was specially chosen by the Lord as a witness while the

other Apostles were alive. Paul's testimony was identical to that

of the other Apostles - what He had seen, heard and taught of the

Lord Jesus was identical to all previous teachings and in accord

with the Old Testament teachings. Much more could have been

written (John 20:30 and 21:25); However, there was no need as

there already existed "all things that pertain to life and

godliness." (II Peter 1:3 and John 20:31)

How many of us, Mormon or Christian have read and digested

all of the meat of the Holy Bible - completely? Can there really

be a need for something more when the original item is still

unplumbed for the depths it contains?

We have the following possibilities: the Bible was written

by either (1) Good Men or Angels, (2) Evil Men or Demons, (3)


Good Men or Angels could not have written it as they could

not write "Thus saith the Lord" when it was a lie or an invention

of their own minds.

Evil men or demons could not have written the Bible as they

would not have written a book that commands all duty, forbids all

sin, and condemns all evil to Hell!

We thus have GOD as the only source of the BIble.

In the ancient Israel, a class of servants in the Temple

were called Scribes. This was a lifelong calling and one of great

importance to the continuance of the Law and Prophets of Israel.

I will demonstrate the LEGAL method of making a copy of a

document according to the laws of Israel at this time and

according to the great traditions of the Talmud. The possibility

for incorrect copy is almost non-existent. Combine this with the

facts as proven by archeology. Prior to the Dead Sea Scroll copy

of the Book of Isaiah, the best copy of that Book was over 1000 Üf�Ü�years newer! In comparing the two copies that covered this gap of

a thousand years, there was found only ONE CHARACTER changed, and

that was an article that "possibly" could have lost the accent

mark of the character to make it 100% identical to the dead sea

scroll version! Imagine - 1000 years of copies and NO CHANGE in

the versions! Now the basis to make copies of the New Testament

were as strict. We find many incidences of the same phenomena of

clarity and correctness. Out of all the many thousands of pieces

and text, not ONE DOCTRINE has been added to or changed or

modified in ANY MANNER!

These documents are free from , providing free webcontent for websites around the world!. copy freely with this link intact. BelieversCafe.com