BRAINWASHED
#2
Now, lets look at the actual
fossil evidence. The earliest fossils to be
found are in the Cambrian
rock strata. And the billions of fossils found there
are all of highly complex
forms of life with no evidence of these complex
forms gradually developing
from a simple form of life.
According to evolutionists
it would have required 1.5 billion years for
these animals to have
evolved. Not a single, indisputable multicellular
fossil has been found
anywhere in the world in a rock supposedly older that
Cambrian rocks. Billions of
highly complex animals...trilobites, brachiopods,
corals, worms, jellyfish,
etc...just suddenly appear, with no signs of gradual
development from lower forms.
Also, throughout the
remainder of the fossil record there is a
remarkable absences of the
many transitional forms demanded by the theory of
evolution.
There are hundreds of
thousands of missing links between invertebrates
and vertebrates. The sea
squirt is presumed to be the ancestry of the
vertebrate.
According to evolutionists
it would have taken 100 million years for
fish to have evolved from an
invertebrate. But there is absolutely no fossil
evidence showing that this
took place.
Again, the evolutionists
claims that it took perhaps 50 million years
for a fish to evolve into an
amphibian. But again, there are no transitional
forms. For example...not a
single fossil with part fins...part feet has ever
been found.
And this is true between
every major plant and animal kind. All higher
categories of living things,
such as complex invertebrates, fishes,
amphibians, reptiles, flying
reptiles, birds, bats, primates and man, appear
abruptly.
Let me quote some comments
by LEADING EVOLUTIONISTS.
Charles Darwin admitted
that "As by this theory innumerable transitional
forms must have existed, who
do we not find them embedded in countless numbers
in the the crust of the
earth? The number of intermediate kinds, between all
living and extinct species,
must have been inconceivably great."
Prof. George Gaylord
Simpson of Harvard University hs said, "Gaps among
known orders, classes and
phyla are systematic and almost always large."
Prof. E.J.H. Corner of
Cambridge University has stated, "I still think,
to the unprejudiced, the
fossil record of plants is in favor of special
creation."
There is no evidence of
even one species changing into another. As the
late Prof. R. Goldschmidt of
the University of California observed,"It is good
to keep in mind... that
nobody has ever succeeded in producing even one new
species by the accumulation
of micromutations".
If evolution is true, why
don't we see living stages of evolution today?
SHouldn't new organs and new
structure still be appearing today? Surely if
evolutionary processes had
truly existed in the past they would still be
operating today.
The fossil of the bird(Archaeopteryx)
is claimed by some to be a link
between birds and reptiles.
But there was a world of difference between
reptiles and Archaeopteryx.
It had wings, feathers...and it flew! The fact
that it had claws on its
wings does not prove that it had a reptilian
ancestry. There are two
birds living today that possess claws!
All palenontologists (those
who study fossils) now acknowledge that
Archaeopteryx was a true
bird.
