BRAINWASHED #5

Let us now consider the beginnings of life itself.

By chance, nothingness developed into substance. That evolved into a

very highly complex organization... without a designer. Darwinists assume

that life, or the primitive cell, arose by pure chance. For example, by chance

some amino acids were formed. Then from these the necessary protein was

formed.

The first problem is that the rate of destruction of even relatively

simple chemical compounds, such as amino acids, by ultraviolet light or

electrical discharges far exceeds their rate of formation. No significant

quantity would thus ever be produced.

Another insuperable barrier is that these amino acids would have to be

arranged in an exact sequence to form a protein...just like the letters in a

sentence. Mere laws of chemistry and physics cannot do that.

The probability of a protein of only 50 amino acids forming by chance

would be 1/10 to the 65th power, or in layman language-

100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,

000,000,000,000,000 to ONE!

Even the very simplest cell contains several thousand different kinds of

proteins, and many billions of each kind, plus all kinds of DNA,RNA, and other

highly complex molecules, along with many complex structures, arranged in an

incredibly complex system.

DNA and RNA are required to produce protein enzymes, but protein enzymes

are required to produce DNA and RNA. Which, then, came first?

Dr. N.W. Pirie of the Rothamstead Experimental Station at Harpenden,

England, rejects this whole concept of spontaneous biogenesis simply on the

well-founded fact that "complicated molecules such as proteins do not, in our

scientific experience, arise spontaneously, even by stages. And all forms of

life known today are dependent on protein."

Dr. John Moore spoke during the annual session of the American

Association for the Advancement of Science. He described the theory that man

evolved from "amoeba and sea-slimes" as an "incredible religion," but not

"science."

Dr. John Moore stated:

"Chromosome variation in animals does not correspond to predictions

based on evolution theory. There is absolutely no pattern of increase of

chromosome number from less complex to more complex, but this should take

place if evolution were true. Furthermore, hereditary material in the genes of

chromosomes shows great variation, frogs having more genetic material that do

humans, which contradicts the theory of evolution. Darwinism is more illogical

than biological."


Index - Evolution or Creation

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 | 210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217 | 218 | 219 | 220 | 221 | 222 | 223 | 224 | 225 | 226 | 227 | 228 | 229 | 230 | 231