BRAINWASHED
#3
The alleged horse series
was created more out of imagination than from
fossil evidence. The fossils
for this series are not found in the proper time
sequence as indicated by the
evolutionists, and the major types appear
abruptly, without
transitions.
And there is an
interesting discrepancy in the skeletal development of
this series.
Eohippus had 18 pairs of
Ribs.
Orohippus had only 15
pairs.
Then Pliohippus jumped to
19
Equus Scotti is back to 18.
Darwin cited the giraffe
as an outstanding example of natural selection.
Supposedly, as a result of
extended droughts, the supply of green leaves could
be obtained only at the tops
of the trees, and therefore the shorter necked
giraffe died off. And the
giraffes which grew longer necks survived.
However, there is no
evidence whatever in the fossil record or elsewhere
that giraffes with short
necks have ever existed. And what would have happened
to young giraffes with
relatively short necks?
Darwin failed to realize
that body characteristics in offspring are
determined and programmed by
DNA factors of the Genes or the Genetic material
of the parents, and not by
the stretching of the neck or any other bodily
exercise.
The cover of the journal,
Science, December 9, 1966, shows a photograph
of a bat fossil that is
alleged to be over 50 million years old. This is said
to be the oldest fossil bat,
but it is the same as a modern bat! Why isn't
there any evidence of change
after 50 million years?
It might be will now to
look at the "evidence" which anthropologists
have assembled, in an
attempt to reconstruct the evolution of man.
Some consider Ramapithecus
to have been homiid (a man-like ape), and
this judgement has been made
solely on the basis of a few fragments of the
jaw. That's all the fossil
fragments they have.
Dr. Jolley has recently
reported that a species of baboon in Ethiopia
has the same dental and jaw
characteristics as Ramapithecus. These
characteristics are
therefore not those of man! Other anthropologists have
agreed that Ramapitecus was
simply an ape.
The first find of
Australopithecines was by Dart in 1924. He pointed out
many ape-like features of
the skull, but he believed the teeth to be manlike.
Its brain was only about 1/3
as large as that of modern man. It was only about
4 feet tall.
Recently, Richard Leakey,
the son of Dr. Leakey. published evidence that
indicated that the
Australopithecines were long-armed, short-legged
knucklewalkers, similar to
living African apes. These creatures were nothing
but apes!
In China, during the 1920's,
fragments of skulls, jaws, and teeth, were
found in a limestone cliff
near Peking. However, during World War II all the
original bones were lost.
All of these creatures had
been killed and eaten, and the skulls
preserved as trophies. Some
prominent anthropologists believe that hunter was
true Man. Peking "man"
must then have been simply a giant ape.
