1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 193 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 197 | 198 | 199 | 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 | 210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217 | 218 | 219 | 220 | 221 | 222 | 223 | 224 | 225 | 226 | 227 | 228 | 229 | 230 | 231THE EVIDENCE FOR CREATION?
Well, we know the evidence against evolution, so what is
the evidence for creation?
The Universe!!
Seriously, as I've stated before creations like evolution cannot be proven,
but creation has a much stronger case.
"Creation and evolution, between them, exhaust the possible explanations
for the origin of living things. Organisms either appeared on the earth
fully developed or they did not. If they did not, they must have developed
from pre-existing species by some process of modification. If they did
appear in a fully developed state, they must have been created by some
omnipotent intelligence" (D.J. Futuyma, 1983).
The facts against evolution (gaps between kinds, no mechanism, increasing
entropy, no new species, no recapitulation or vestigial organs, DNA itself,
etc., are actual predictions from the creation model.
I think you would appreciate and enjoy the book
"What Is Creation Science" by Henry Morris. While not technically deep it
shows scientifically the viability of the creation model.
The existence of a creation necessitates the reality of a Creator.
Intricate design requires a careful and intelligent master; organization
requires an Organizer. Scientific Laws demand a Law Giver.
Pure and simple logic.
Historical geology is based on the assumption of evolutionary biology.
Therefore, the primary evidence for evolution is the assumption of
evolution!!! Blatant circular reasoning that is completely invalid...
Evolutionist are in a precarious position when sitting on the chair of the
general theory (I stress theory, not fact as taught in our schools today,
of evolution. This expresses their position nicely:
"As I was sitting in my chair,
I knew it had no bottom there,
No legs, or back, but I just sat,
Ignoring little things like that."
Index - Evolution or Creation